Solution Brief
Defensible review. Inside your firm.

Review youcan defend.

Defensible e-discovery on AMD Instinct™ MI350P.Relevance, privilege and PII coding across millions of documents, on one LIQID UltraStack server, on a model version you control.

20
GPUs
MI350P on one host, room for 30
2.88
TB
HBM3E on one server
9.5
×
coding scaling, 1 to 10 GPUs
0
hops
network hops between GPUs

The Defensibility Dilemma

Send first-pass review to a vendor, or bring it in-house on a model you can explain.

Volume Pressure

Review grows with every matter

First-pass budgets go to outside vendors, priced per document.

AI in use, protocols missing

61% use AI-assisted review; under a third document protocols.

Court Pressure

Courts ask how AI was used

Model, configuration, validation and error rates.

Hosted APIs shift underneath you

A model that changes without notice is hard to defend.

Privilege Pressure

Privileged documents can’t leave

Client-confidential data has to stay in your environment.

Attorneys own the call

Every AI decision has to link back to its source document.

Pin It. Run It. Defend It.

One 20-GPU LIQID UltraStack server runs the whole first-pass pipeline. Small models code every document, a 70B model drafts the privilege log and checks the calls, and a reviewer model reports error rates.

  • Pinned, logged model: the review can be reproduced
  • No per-token or per-document fees
  • Grow from 10 to 20 to 30 GPUs on the same host
GPU allocation for one review pipeline with pinned, logged models: 12 GPUs for the coding fleet, 6 for privilege log and QC, 2 for validation sampling, on a LIQID GPU chassis with 20 AMD Instinct MI350P and 2.88 TB HBM3E, with a direct PCIe Gen 5 connection to one dual-socket AMD EPYC 9005 host with one OS image.

Coding Fleet · 12 GPUs

Mistral Small 3.2 and Llama 3.1 8B code every document for relevance, privilege and PII.

9.5×
scaling, 1 to 10 GPUs
44,383
tok/s on 10 GPUs, 7B-class

Privilege Log + QC · 6 GPUs

Llama 3.3 70B, one full model per GPU, drafts log entries and checks coding calls.

1,256
tok/s, 72B-class, interactive, 8 GPUs
1 GPU
per 70B model at FP8

Validation Sampling · 2 GPUs

gpt-oss-120b reviews statistical samples and reports error rates.

144 GB
HBM3E per MI350P
1 card
holds gpt-oss-120b
Measured results: LIQID Phase-3 testing on 1 to 20 MI350P GPUs on one host. Test conditions and notes on page 2.
LIQID UltraStack with AMD MI350P for Legal

Proof: Measured on MI350P

No vendor, no cluster: one server, a pinned model and a validation record the court can follow.

Result
What was measured
Why it matters here
9.5× scaling
1 to 10 GPUs, 7B-class
4,653 tok/s on 1 GPU to 44,383 tok/s on 10, one replica per GPU
Coding throughput grows with every GPU in the fleet
1,256 tok/s
on 8 GPUs
72B-class model, FP8, under interactive limits: P99 TTFT ≤ 2 s, ≥ 30 tok/s per user
Privilege log drafting at interactive speed for reviewers
1 GPU
per 70B model
Llama 3.3 70B is ~70 GB at FP8 and fits on one 144 GB MI350P with room for cache
Each stage runs on its own GPUs, with no model split across cards
What it means
Every document gets a first pass
Attorneys review flagged calls, not every page
7B-class: FP4, one replica per GPU, concurrency 128. 72B-class: FP8, one replica per GPU, P99 time-to-first-token ≤ 2 s, ≥ 30 tok/s per user. Different test conditions; don't compare them. Source: LIQID Phase-3 testing. Mistral Small 3.2, Llama and gpt-oss-120b performance is projected from these results; 7B-class scaling is measured to 20 GPUs (~89,000 tok/s).

Grow on the Same Server: 10, 20 and 30 GPUs

Add GPUs and a new job, not a new cluster.

10
GPUs
1.44 TB HBM3E

Practice-group review and diligence

Every attorney in a practice group, plus dedicated capacity for deal diligence.

Model layout

6 × Llama 3.3 70B interactive review · 4 × Llama 3.3 70B bulk diligence

Who buys, why now

Practice Group Leader / Director of Legal Innovation. Adoption beyond the pilot; deal volume.

Start here
20
GPUs
2.88 TB HBM3E

Defensible first-pass e-discovery

Relevance, privilege and PII coding across millions of documents, on a version-pinned model.

Model layout

12 × Mistral Small 3.2 coding fleet · 6 × Llama 3.3 70B privilege log and QC · 2 × gpt-oss-120b validation sampling

Who buys, why now

Litigation Support / e-Discovery Director. Large matter, review vendor cost, court scrutiny of AI.

30
GPUs
4.32 TB HBM3E

Firm-wide private model hub

Contract review, e-discovery, research Q&A and billing narratives on one host.

Model layout

8 × Llama 3.3 70B contract review · 14 × e-discovery · 6 × gpt-oss-120b cited research Q&A · 2 × Llama 3.1 8B billing narratives

Who buys, why now

CIO / Chief Knowledge Officer. Client demand for AI with no data egress.

Every GPU runs one pinned model with a fixed job, which keeps each step easy to defend. Starting with one job? See the 4-GPU Contract Review brief.

What UltraStack Adds

  • One model per GPU: 144 GB HBM3E holds a full 70B model at FP8, or gpt-oss-120b.
  • No network between GPUs: peer-to-peer over PCIe Gen 5 to one EPYC host.
  • Air-cooled: about 22 kW for the full 30-GPU system.

Simple by Design

  • Direct connection: the GPU chassis cables straight to the host. Nothing to design, buy or tune in between.
  • One host: one OS image, one license footprint, one thing to patch.
  • Room to grow: 10 to 20 to 30 GPUs on the same host.

What Is Proven Today

  • P2P bandwidth saturates the link; RCCL collectives pass, 1 to 10 GPUs.
  • ROCm integration complete, developed jointly with AMD.
  • 200+ production deployments, 85+ patents.
The Efficiency Case · Targets, not measurements*
75%
Up to 75% fewer servers
2.1×
Up to 2.1× more tokens per dollar
1.8×
Up to 1.8× better tokens per watt
50%
Up to 50% lower power

Bring Us Three Numbers

Two questions settle the size of the opportunity: how many documents are in your next large matter, and what will first-pass review cost?

1
Volume:

documents per matter, matters per year.

2
Deadline:

the production turnaround required.

3
Concurrency:

reviewers working at peak.

Built for

Litigation support · e-Discovery · Legal innovation · Knowledge management

Proven on

AMD Instinct™ MI350P · AMD EPYC™ 9005 · ROCm™ · 200+ LIQID deployments

*Efficiency targets compare against multi-server deployments of the same GPUs; they are LIQID internal projections using AMD published specifications, and results vary by configuration and workload.

Performance figures for the AMD Instinct MI350P are based on AMD published specifications and LIQID Phase-3 testing from 1 to 20 GPUs, and are subject to change. 30-GPU figures are projected from measured 20-GPU scaling. Every layout runs one model per GPU; 20- and 30-GPU layouts are sizing arithmetic on published model sizes, not benchmark results. Models shown are US and EU open-weight models. Outputs support, and do not replace, attorney review; review protocols and validation remain the firm's responsibility. Adoption data: EDRM 2025.

Speak With An Expert